llms.txt present

An /llms.txt file gives agents a hand-picked Markdown map of your most important content.

Standard
Emerging checkEmerging
Off by default, turn on in settings

Who supports it

No agent or browser has announced support yet.

27 others: no evidence yet. See every agent and browser

What it checks

The extension requests /llms.txt and checks the body against the format at llmstxt.org. A file is flagged when:

  • the body is HTML rather than Markdown, which usually means a soft 404;
  • the body is under 50 bytes;
  • there is no H1 (a line starting with # ), which the format requires;
  • there are no Markdown links.

It also sends a HEAD request for /llms-full.txt and notes it if present. That file is a common convention, not part of the llms.txt format, so it never passes this check on its own.

llms.txt is widely published but has no confirmed consumer yet, so this is a bonus check: it adds points when present and costs nothing when absent.

Results

Status When
Pass /llms.txt exists and has none of the problems above
Warn /llms.txt exists but has one or more of the problems above
N/A No /llms.txt was found
Unmeasured The request failed with a server error or network error

How to fix

Publish a Markdown file at /llms.txt with an H1 naming the project and links to your most important pages:

# Example Ltd

> Accounting software for small businesses.

## Docs

- [Getting started](https://example.com/docs/getting-started.md): Install and set up an account.
- [API reference](https://example.com/docs/api.md): Endpoints, authentication, and limits.

Keep its links working; llms.txt links resolve checks them. For larger sites, see also Modular llms.txt.

Support by agent and browser

Announced means the vendor’s own docs or announcement say so. Published is the date on the vendor’s own page, where it has one. Checked is the last time our weekly research found that page still saying so.

No agent or browser has announced anything about this yet.

No evidence yet27
  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Perplexity
  • Copilot
  • Meta AI
  • ChatGPT Atlas
  • Comet
  • Dia
  • Gemini in Chrome
  • Edge Copilot Mode
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Codex
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • CCBot
  • Applebot
  • Amazonbot
  • Bytespider
  • Cohere
  • Mistral
  • DuckAssist
  • Chrome
  • Edge
  • Firefox
  • Safari

Adoption on the top 100 sites

26 of 93 measured sites implement it

Scanned 23 Oct 2026 with the Sitebulb Labs extension, against the Tranco list (tranco-56Z8N). 7 sites couldn’t be measured (bot challenge or timeout) and are left out of the share.

9 Oct 2026: 31%12 Oct 2026: 29%23 Oct 2026: 28%
9 Oct 2026 31% → 23 Oct 2026 28%
Sites implementing it26
  1. #2 cloudflare.com
  2. #4 facebook.com (with warnings)
  3. #13 instagram.com (with warnings)
  4. #27 outlook.live.com (via live.com) (with warnings)
  5. #32 github.com
  6. #37 fastly.com (via fastly.net)
  7. #43 netflix.com (with warnings)
  8. #52 uk.pinterest.com (via pinterest.com) (with warnings)
  9. #55 wordpress.org
  10. #60 digicert.com
  11. #61 adobe.com
  12. #63 tiktok.com (with warnings)
  13. #76 opera.com
  14. #87 qq.com (with warnings)
  15. #98 telegram.org (via t.me) (with warnings)
  16. #101 wordpress.com
  17. #103 reddit.com (with warnings)
  18. #106 sentry.io
  19. #112 chatgpt.com (with warnings)
  20. #119 nic.ru (with warnings)
  21. #120 samsung.com
  22. #122 intuit.com
  23. #132 dropbox.com
  24. #147 reg.ru (with warnings)
  25. #153 webex.com
  26. #158 kaspersky.co.uk (via kaspersky.com)

Overview

2/9

Speculative

Specified, but little evidence anything uses it yet.

How this rating is worked out2 of 9 points
FactorPointsWhy
Vendor support0 / 30 vendors supporting, 0 partly or planned
Top-100 adoption2 / 328% of measured sites
Spec maturity0 / 3Community proposal

8 or more points is Established, 5 to 7 is Gaining traction, 2 to 4 is Speculative and under 2 is Stalled. A feature is also Stalled when more vendors have said no than yes. Read the spec.

Community insights

  • Sceptical

    After IP verification, 72% of bot-claimed llms.txt requests were spoofed. GPTBot is the only verified bot that fetched llms.txt more than once. The file’s primary audience is the SEO industry auditing whether the file exists.

    Artur FerreiraFounder, The GEO LabOn their blog, 20 Jul 2026Website
  • Mixed

    It is free to produce, it hurts nothing, and a small share of its readers are real agents. But we stopped treating it as the destination and put the effort where the agents actually go.

    Adam AltmanCEO and Founder, RedoclyOn their blog, 9 Sept 2026Website
  • Sceptical

    If you publish an llms.txt file today, the most likely outcome by far is that nothing ever fetches it.

    Louise LinehanContent Marketer, AhrefsOn their blog, 15 Jun 2026Website
  • Sceptical

    FWIW no AI system currently uses llms.txt.

    John MuellerSearch Advocate, GoogleOn Bluesky, 17 Jun 2025Bluesky

Quotes are from public posts, checked against the original before they appear here. Suggest an insight, or ask for yours to be removed.