Markdown alternate link
A rel="alternate" link pointing to text/markdown tells an agent a Markdown copy exists, so it does not have to guess.
- Category
- Content accessibility
- Standard
- Emerging checkEmerging
- Off by default, turn on in settings
Who supports it
No agent or browser has announced support yet.
27 others: no evidence yet. See every agent and browser
What it checks
The extension looks for a link to a Markdown copy of the page in two places:
- The HTTP
Linkresponse header, withtype="text/markdown". - A
<link rel="alternate">element on the rendered page with atext/markdowntype.
Results
| Status | When |
|---|---|
| Pass | A Markdown alternate is advertised in the Link header or the page |
| N/A | No Markdown alternate is advertised |
How to fix
Add a <link> element to the page’s <head> pointing to its Markdown copy:
<link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://example.com/docs/setup.md" />
Or send the equivalent response header:
Link: <https://example.com/docs/setup.md>; rel="alternate"; type="text/markdown"
Related: Markdown URL fallback and Link response headers.
Support by agent and browser
Announced means the vendor’s own docs or announcement say so. Published is the date on the vendor’s own page, where it has one. Checked is the last time our weekly research found that page still saying so.
No agent or browser has announced anything about this yet.
No evidence yet27
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Copilot
- Meta AI
- ChatGPT Atlas
- Comet
- Dia
- Gemini in Chrome
- Edge Copilot Mode
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Codex
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- CCBot
- Applebot
- Amazonbot
- Bytespider
- Cohere
- Mistral
- DuckAssist
- Chrome
- Edge
- Firefox
- Safari
Names and marks belong to their owners and are used only to identify products. None of these vendors is affiliated with Sitebulb. Spotted something out of date? Send a correction.
Adoption on the top 100 sites
2 of 99 measured sites implement it
Sites implementing it2
- #2 cloudflare.com
- #55 wordpress.org
Overview
How this rating is worked out4 of 9 points
| Factor | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor support | 0 / 3 | 0 vendors supporting, 0 partly or planned |
| Top-100 adoption | 1 / 3 | 2% of measured sites |
| Spec maturity | 3 / 3 | Published standard |
8 or more points is Established, 5 to 7 is Gaining traction, 2 to 4 is Speculative and under 2 is Stalled. A feature is also Stalled when more vendors have said no than yes. Read the spec.
Community insights
No community insights for this feature yet.
Quotes are from public posts, checked against the original before they appear here. Suggest an insight, or ask for yours to be removed.